I bought the 5090 at a sweaty 2400€

what the hell, here I thought I was making a mistake back then

Help me decide. Whats better?

Any opinions on this? I'm not fully educated on all things when it comes to this stuff, but am I wrong for thinking this wont make much of a difference?

Expeditions Rome (18% DLSS Preset L vs 100% in-game scaling with TAA). Nvidia suggests -3.5 for LOD bias. I was using -4.5
Ryse Son of Rome (18% DLSS Preset L vs 100% in-game scaling with TAA). (DLSS got gbuffer off and uses anisotropic filtering for foliage so armour/trees will look different. TAA got forced SMAA which DLSS doesn't use.)

There is obviously shimmering/ghosting when moving but it is insane how good the reconstruction looks compared to older generations.

I cannot wait for Transformer 3.0 or FP6/FP4 DLSS versions.

I feel like nobody was talking about this over the weekend.
Nvidia themselves provided the 8.2 CVSS score. I know it's not known to be exploited in the wild, and Nvidia appear to have quickly fixed the bug under CVE-2026-47483.

Hey, I'm new to this and went with an aggressive OC, did 0.99V @3180 +3000 on memory, 110% power limit. I think I got it similar to 5080 level of performance. It's drawing around 15-20W more than stock and temps are around 4°C hotter, but it stays below 65°C so I think I shouldn't worry about that. Is it okay? I did a benchmark in Forza Horizon 6 to compare to a 5080 with the same in-game settings. Let me know your thoughts.