Harvesting fresh produce is only the beginning of the journey from field to customer. Once vegetables, fruits, and other crops are removed from the plant, they need to be collected, protected, organized, packed, and transported carefully. The right produce harvesting supplies can help growers and produce businesses manage these steps more efficiently while reducing unnecessary damage and handling problems.

From cartons and reusable containers to bags, liners, films, labels, tags, straps, and ties, post-harvest supplies serve different purposes throughout the produce-handling process. Selecting the right combination depends on the type of crop, harvesting method, storage requirements, transportation conditions, and final destination.

For commercial growers and produce operations, having suitable supplies available can make the workflow from harvest to shipment more organized and efficient.

Why Produce Harvesting Supplies Matter?

Fresh produce can be sensitive to pressure, moisture, temperature changes, rough handling, and transportation. Even when crops are harvested carefully, improper packaging or handling afterward can affect their condition.

Produce harvesting supplies help address several important needs, including:

• Collecting harvested crops
• Protecting produce during handling
• Organizing products for storage
• Supporting transportation
• Keeping produce separated
• Identifying different products or lots
• Securing packages and containers
• Improving post-harvest workflow

The right supplies should be selected according to the specific characteristics of the crop. A container that works well for one type of produce may not be appropriate for another.

Growers should consider the size, weight, shape, fragility, moisture requirements, and expected transportation conditions of their produce before choosing packaging and handling materials.

Choosing the Right Cartons for Harvested Produce

Cartons are an important part of produce handling because they provide a structured container for storing and transporting harvested crops.

Depending on the application, growers and produce businesses may choose between different carton types, including waxed cartons, unwaxed cartons, and reusable plastic containers.

Waxed Cartons

SHOP NOW

Waxed cartons can be useful in situations where additional resistance to moisture is required.

Fresh produce may contain moisture, and some crops are stored or transported in environments where cartons can be exposed to damp conditions. A waxed surface can provide additional protection compared with conventional paperboard in certain applications.

The appropriate carton should still be selected according to the specific crop and handling environment. Factors such as ventilation, stacking, weight, and transportation conditions should be considered.

Unwaxed Cartons

SHOP NOW

Unwaxed cartons provide another option for produce packaging and handling.

They may be suitable for applications where moisture resistance is less critical or where the characteristics of the produce and transportation environment make standard corrugated packaging appropriate.

When selecting cartons, growers should consider the dimensions and weight requirements of the produce, as well as how cartons will be stacked, stored, and transported.

Reusable Plastic Containers

SHOP NOW

Reusable plastic containers, often referred to as RPCs, can be useful for produce operations that require durable containers for repeated handling cycles.

Unlike single-use packaging, reusable containers can be designed for repeated use when properly managed and maintained.

RPCs can be particularly useful for operations where produce moves through established harvesting, distribution, and return systems.

When evaluating reusable containers, consider their size, durability, ventilation, cleaning requirements, and compatibility with the handling process.

Plastics and Film for Produce Handling

Cartons are only one part of the post-harvest packaging process. Plastics and film can also play an important role in protecting, organizing, and preparing fresh produce for transportation or distribution.

Depending on the application, produce operations may use bags, liners, and different types of film.

Produce Bags

SHOP NOW

Bags can provide a convenient way to contain individual produce items, groups of products, or smaller quantities.

The appropriate type and size of bag depend on the produce being handled. Some crops may require additional protection, while others may benefit from packaging that allows airflow.

Growers should avoid selecting bags based solely on size or cost. Material properties, durability, intended use, and handling conditions are also important considerations.

For commercial operations, consistency can also be valuable. Using appropriately sized bags can make packing and product presentation more organized.

Liners

SHOP NOW

Liners can be used inside cartons, containers, and other packaging systems to provide an additional layer between the produce and the outer container.

Depending on the application, liners may help manage moisture, provide separation, or support the overall packaging process.

When selecting a liner, growers should consider the type of produce, the packaging container, moisture conditions, and the expected duration of storage or transportation.

A liner should complement the packaging system rather than interfere with ventilation, stacking, or handling requirements.

Film

SHOP NOW

Film can be used in a variety of produce-handling applications.

Depending on its characteristics, film may help secure packaging, group products, protect certain items, or support other stages of the post-harvest process.

The appropriate film depends on the intended use, including the size and shape of the product, required durability, and environmental conditions.

As with other packaging materials, growers should select film based on actual operating requirements rather than simply choosing the least expensive option.

Labels and Tags for Produce Operations

Once produce has been harvested and packaged, keeping products properly identified becomes increasingly important.

Labels and tags can help growers, packers, distributors, and other members of the supply chain identify products and organize shipments.

Depending on the operation, identification may include information such as:

• Product type
• Variety
• Lot information
• Harvest information
• Quantity
• Destination
• Handling instructions
• Other operational details

Clear identification can reduce confusion when multiple crops, varieties, or orders are being handled at the same time.

For larger produce operations, an organized labeling system can also make it easier to track products as they move through different stages of handling.

Bands and Tags for Produce Handling

SHOP NOW

Bands and tags can provide another practical solution for grouping or identifying produce and packaged items.

They can be useful when products need to remain organized during harvesting, packing, storage, or distribution.

The right band or tag depends on the application. Growers should consider the size of the product or package, the amount of handling involved, and whether the material will be exposed to moisture or other environmental conditions.

Small details such as these can make a difference in a busy produce-handling environment.

Strap and Buckle Solutions

SHOP NOW

Once produce has been packed into cartons, containers, or grouped units, securing those packages may become necessary.

Straps and buckles can help keep loads together during handling and transportation.

For larger operations, properly secured packages can be particularly important when products are stacked or moved between different locations.

When selecting strapping materials, consider:

• Load size
• Package dimensions
• Required strength
• Handling method
• Storage conditions
• Transportation requirements

The goal is to use a securing system that is appropriate for the load without creating unnecessary pressure on the packaging or produce.

Tape and Ties

SHOP NOW

Tape and ties can provide simple but useful solutions throughout produce handling.

Tape may be used for securing packaging or supporting specific packing processes, while ties can help bundle materials or keep components organized.

Although these products may appear relatively small compared with cartons or containers, they can contribute to an efficient workflow.

For commercial operations, having commonly used tapes and ties available can prevent small packaging tasks from slowing down the larger harvesting and shipping process.

How to Choose the Right Produce Harvesting Supplies

There is no single combination of supplies that works for every produce operation. The best choices depend on the crop, harvesting process, packaging requirements, and transportation conditions.

Before purchasing supplies, growers should evaluate several factors.

1. Type of Produce

Different crops have different handling requirements.

Delicate produce may require more protective packaging, while harder or more durable crops may tolerate different types of containers and handling methods.

Consider the crop’s size, weight, shape, moisture content, and sensitivity to pressure.

2. Harvesting Volume

The size of the operation can influence the type and quantity of supplies required.

A small farm may have different packaging needs from a commercial operation harvesting large quantities every day.

Higher-volume operations should also consider whether supplies can be replenished consistently during peak harvesting periods.

3. Transportation

Consider how the produce will move after harvesting.

Will it remain on the farm? Will it travel to a packing facility? Will it be transported directly to a distributor, market, restaurant, or retailer?

Longer transportation distances may require different packaging and securing solutions than short-distance movement.

4. Moisture and Environmental Conditions

Fresh produce and agricultural environments can involve significant moisture.

Cartons, liners, bags, films, and other materials should be selected according to the expected environmental conditions.

A packaging material that performs well in a dry environment may not necessarily be suitable where moisture exposure is high.

5. Storage Requirements

Storage conditions should also be considered.

If produce will remain packaged for an extended period, growers should consider ventilation, stacking, moisture management, and container durability.

Packaging should support the storage environment rather than create additional problems.

Building a Complete Post-Harvest Supply System

Rather than looking at each supply individually, growers can benefit from considering the entire post-harvest workflow.

For example, a typical process might involve:

Harvest → Collection → Sorting → Packaging → Identification → Securing → Storage → Transportation

Different supplies can support each stage.

Cartons and RPCs can provide containers for harvested crops. Bags, liners, and film can provide additional packaging options. Labels and tags can help identify products. Bands, straps, buckles, tape, and ties can help organize or secure packages.

Thinking about the entire process can make it easier to identify which supplies are actually necessary.

Why Quality Matters in Agricultural Packaging

Agricultural supplies are exposed to demanding working environments. Packaging and handling materials may be moved repeatedly, stacked, transported, exposed to moisture, and handled by multiple workers.

For this reason, durability should be considered when purchasing produce harvesting supplies.

A packaging material that fails during handling can create additional labor and potentially damage the product. Similarly, poorly suited labels or securing materials can create problems further along the supply chain.

Growers should therefore evaluate supplies based on their intended use, material characteristics, durability, and compatibility with the rest of the handling process.

Organizing Supplies Before Harvest Season

One of the simplest ways to improve post-harvest efficiency is to prepare supplies before the busiest part of the season.

Waiting until harvest is underway to order cartons, bags, labels, tape, or other materials can create unnecessary pressure on the operation.

Before harvest begins, growers can estimate expected production volumes and determine how many containers and packaging materials may be required.

It can also be useful to maintain an inventory of frequently used supplies.

A simple inventory system can track:

• Cartons
• Containers
• Bags
• Liners
• Film
• Labels
• Tags
• Straps
• Buckles
• Tape
• Ties

Keeping supplies organized allows workers to access the materials they need without interrupting the harvesting workflow.

Considering Reusable and Single-Use Options

Depending on the operation, growers may use both reusable and single-use packaging.

Reusable plastic containers can be valuable where an established return, cleaning, and reuse system exists. Cartons and other disposable packaging may be more practical in situations where containers are not returned.

The right choice depends on the operation’s logistics, transportation system, cleaning capabilities, storage space, and overall packaging requirements.

Rather than choosing one option for every situation, growers can evaluate which format makes the most sense for each product and distribution channel.

Final Thoughts

Successful harvesting does not end when produce is removed from the plant. Proper collection, packaging, identification, securing, storage, and transportation are all important parts of the post-harvest process.

The right produce harvesting supplies can help growers and produce businesses create a more organized and efficient workflow. Cartons, RPCs, bags, liners, film, labels, tags, straps, buckles, tape, and ties each serve different purposes and can be combined according to the needs of the operation.

By considering the type of crop, harvesting volume, moisture conditions, transportation requirements, storage environment, and expected handling, growers can make more informed decisions about the supplies they use.

A well-planned post-harvest system can help reduce unnecessary handling problems while keeping produce organized from the field through the next stage of the supply chain.

I am an agricultural engineer and. I recently graduated and I am interested in star farming and. I need advice to start and I need to as about the courses that I should take and if the machine learning course is useful

https://agrinexus.it

Ditemi cosa ne pensate del sito e delle proprie funzioni

I just realized there’s basically a purple version of almost every vegetable

And apparently it’s not just about looks, that purple color often means more antioxidants too.

Redbor kale even just became the first crop in nearly 100 years to be recognized as both a top vegetable and an ornamental. I’m curious, which purple crop would you grow?

Farmers and agronomists: what would make you trust — or distrust — an AI farm advisor?

I've been working on a mobile agricultural assistant called Umay Ana.

One thing became clear while building it: giving a farmer another generic AI chatbot isn't particularly useful.

So we're experimenting with a different approach.

The app considers things such as location, season, weather conditions and crop information and tries to turn them into practical decisions — planting timing, irrigation/fertilization guidance, disease risks, weekly farm activities, and warnings when an action may be better postponed.

But I'm much more interested in what farmers wouldn't trust an app to decide.

For example:

Would you trust an app telling you when not to irrigate?

Would you trust a photo-based plant disease warning?

Would you want AI to recommend crops for your location, or would that cross the line into decisions that should always remain with the farmer/agronomist?

We're already building the product, so this isn't an idea-validation survey. I'm trying to understand where useful decision support ends and “AI pretending to be an agronomist” begins.

I'd really appreciate opinions from farmers, agronomists and people working in AgTech.

Happy to share screenshots or explain how we're approaching it if anyone is interested.

Birds can be an important part of a healthy ecosystem, but when large numbers begin feeding on crops, they can quickly become a serious problem for growers. Fruit, vegetables, grains, seeds, seedlings, and other crops can all be vulnerable to bird damage.

For farmers and growers, effective bird pest control strategies are therefore an important part of protecting crops and reducing avoidable losses. The right approach depends on the crop, bird species, size of the affected area, timing of the damage, and local regulations.

Bird control generally works best when growers use an integrated strategy instead of depending on one deterrent continuously. Physical exclusion, habitat management, visual deterrents, and sound-based bird deterrents can all play a role in a well-planned bird management program.

Why Is Bird Pest Control Important?

Bird damage can range from minor feeding activity to significant crop losses. A flock may repeatedly return to the same field once birds discover a reliable source of food.

Birds can damage crops in several ways:

• Eating fruits, seeds, grains, or vegetables
• Pecking and damaging ripening fruit
• Damaging young plants and seedlings
• Breaking stems or buds while feeding
• Contaminating produce with droppings
• Knocking fruit or nuts from plants
• Increasing crop losses when large flocks gather

Some crops are particularly attractive to birds as they approach maturity. Orchards, vineyards, berry farms, grain fields, vegetable farms, and specialty crop operations may all experience bird pressure.

The key is to identify bird activity early rather than waiting until substantial crop damage has already occurred. Monitoring bird numbers, locations, feeding patterns, and the timing of activity can help growers determine when intervention is necessary.

Common Bird Pest Control Methods

There is no single bird deterrent that works equally well for every farm or bird species. Effective management usually combines several techniques.

1. Physical Exclusion

Physical exclusion prevents birds from reaching the crop in the first place.

Bird netting is one of the most effective options for high-value crops such as berries, grapes, and fruit. Properly installed netting can create a physical barrier between birds and the crop.

However, netting can require considerable installation time and expense, particularly across large agricultural areas. It may also need regular inspection to make sure there are no gaps where birds can enter.

For smaller growing areas or valuable crops, physical exclusion can be an important part of an overall bird management plan.

2. Habitat Management

Birds often use nearby trees, brush, structures, irrigation equipment, and other areas for shelter or perching.

Reducing unnecessary attractants and potential roosting locations around vulnerable crop areas can help reduce bird pressure.

Growers should inspect the property for:

• Dense brush near crop areas
• Unnecessary piles of materials
• Potential roosting locations
• Nearby food sources
• Water sources that attract birds
• Structures where birds regularly gather

Habitat management should generally be considered alongside other deterrent methods rather than as the only solution.

3. Visual Bird Deterrents

Visual deterrents work by creating movement or visual signals that birds associate with danger.

Examples can include:

• Reflective streamers
• Scare balloons
• Predator-shaped devices
• Reflective materials
• Moving objects
• Other visual scare devices

One important consideration is habituation. Birds can learn that a stationary object is harmless if they encounter it repeatedly without experiencing a real threat.

For this reason, visual deterrents are generally more useful when their placement or type is varied as part of a broader bird-control program.

4. Sound-Based Bird Deterrents

Sound is another commonly used approach for agricultural bird control.

Noise-based deterrents are designed to make an area less attractive to birds by producing sounds that cause them to move away. Depending on the product and application, this can include distress-call systems, pyrotechnic devices, or propane-powered bird deterrents.

Research and agricultural extension guidance indicate that sound deterrents can be useful, but birds may become accustomed to predictable sounds or repeated patterns. Changing deterrent methods and avoiding unnecessary continuous use can help reduce habituation.

This is why a successful bird pest control strategy should focus on timing, variation, and the specific bird problem rather than simply creating continuous noise.

Bird Control Products for Agricultural Applications

For growers looking for sound-based bird deterrent equipment, Vegetable Growers Supply offers several products designed for bird and pest deterrence.

Bird Banger

Shop Now

Bird bangers are used as an auditory deterrent to help discourage birds from remaining in agricultural areas. They can be considered as part of a broader bird-management strategy where appropriate.

Because products involving pyrotechnics can be subject to local laws, regulations, and safety requirements, users should always check applicable requirements and follow the manufacturer’s instructions.

Double Shot Launcher

Shop Now

The Double Shot Launcher is another option for agricultural bird and pest deterrence. A product such as this may be considered where growers need an additional auditory deterrent as part of an integrated crop-protection strategy.

The goal of sound-based deterrence is not to harm birds but to encourage them to leave areas where they are causing crop damage.

M-4 Cannon Propane-Powered

Shop Now

Propane-powered bird cannons are another established category of agricultural bird deterrent. They produce loud sounds intended to discourage birds from remaining in vulnerable crop areas.

Propane-fired cannons are commonly discussed as an auditory deterrent for agricultural applications, although their effectiveness can vary depending on bird species, crop, field conditions, and how the equipment is managed.

As with any bird-control equipment, users should consider nearby homes, livestock, workers, neighboring properties, and local noise restrictions before using sound-based equipment.

Single Shot Launcher

Shop Now

The Single Shot Launcher is another bird and pest deterrent option for agricultural applications.

Pyrotechnic bird deterrent products should only be used by appropriately trained users and in accordance with the manufacturer’s directions and all applicable laws and regulations.

Why You Should Not Depend on One Bird Deterrent

One of the biggest mistakes in bird management is relying on the same deterrent for an extended period.

Birds are adaptable. If they repeatedly encounter a sound, object, or movement without experiencing an actual threat, they may eventually stop responding to it.

Agricultural guidance recommends combining different categories of deterrents and changing tactics when birds begin becoming accustomed to a particular method.

For example, an integrated strategy may involve:

Monitoring → Habitat management → Physical exclusion → Visual deterrents → Sound deterrents

The exact combination should depend on the crop and the bird species causing the problem.

How to Build an Effective Bird Pest Control Strategy

A practical bird-management program starts with understanding the problem.

Step 1: Identify the Bird Species

Different birds behave differently and may respond differently to deterrents.

Before choosing a control method, determine:

• Which bird species are present?
• How many birds are involved?
• Where are they entering the property?
• Where are they feeding?
• When does activity increase?
• Which crops are being damaged?

Understanding the species and behavior makes it easier to choose an appropriate management approach.

Step 2: Monitor the Crop

Regular monitoring can help identify bird pressure before losses become severe.

Look for:

• Pecked fruit
• Missing seeds
• Damaged buds
• Droppings
• Feathers
• Birds gathering near crop areas
• Damaged or fallen fruit

Keeping records can also help growers determine whether their deterrent strategy is actually reducing bird activity.

Step 3: Start Deterrence Early

Bird control is often easier when deterrents are introduced before birds become established in an area.

Once birds learn that a particular field provides a dependable food source, changing their behavior can become more difficult.

Agricultural IPM guidance recommends having deterrent measures ready before significant damage begins.

Step 4: Combine Different Methods

Combining different deterrents can make the crop area less predictable and less attractive to pest birds.

For example, growers may combine physical exclusion with visual deterrents and appropriately managed sound deterrents.

Recent research also highlights the growing role of technology-driven bird deterrence, including sensor-based systems, lasers, drones, and other adaptive approaches.

Step 5: Evaluate the Results

Bird control should be treated as an ongoing management process.

After implementing a deterrent, monitor:

• Bird numbers
• Crop damage
• Bird feeding locations
• Changes in bird behavior
• Effectiveness of individual deterrents

If birds are no longer responding to a particular deterrent, it may be time to change or combine approaches.

Safety and Legal Considerations

Bird control requires more than simply selecting an effective deterrent.

Some bird species may be protected by local, state, or federal wildlife laws. Regulations regarding bird management, pyrotechnic devices, noise, propane equipment, and pest-control activities can also vary by location.

Before using any bird deterrent equipment, growers should:

• Check applicable local regulations
• Confirm whether the target species is protected
• Follow manufacturer instructions
• Use equipment only for its intended purpose
• Keep unauthorized people away from equipment
• Consider nearby workers, livestock, homes, and roads
• Follow applicable fire and noise requirements

The goal of bird pest control should be to reduce crop damage through responsible deterrence and management rather than unnecessary harm to wildlife.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best pest control for birds on a farm?

There is no single solution for every farm. Effective bird control commonly combines monitoring, habitat management, physical exclusion, visual deterrents, and sound-based deterrents according to the crop and bird species.

How do I keep birds away from my crops?

Bird netting, visual deterrents, habitat management, and sound-based deterrents can all be considered. The most appropriate approach depends on the crop, field size, bird species, and level of damage.

Do bird deterrents really work?

Bird deterrents can reduce bird activity, but effectiveness varies by species and situation. Birds can become accustomed to predictable deterrents, which is why integrated and varied management is generally recommended.

Are propane bird cannons effective?

Propane-powered cannons are an established type of auditory bird deterrent. Their effectiveness varies according to the bird species, crop, field conditions, and management approach. They should be used responsibly and according to applicable requirements.

Can bird netting prevent crop damage?

Properly installed netting can provide strong physical protection and is particularly useful for high-value crops. However, installation and maintenance requirements should be considered before choosing netting for a large growing area.

How can I stop birds from getting used to deterrents?

Avoid relying on one predictable deterrent continuously. Varying deterrent types and combining visual, physical, and auditory methods can help make the crop area less predictable to birds.

Final Thoughts

Effective pest control bird management is about protecting crops while using responsible and appropriate deterrent methods.

Birds can quickly identify reliable food sources, so early monitoring and a well-planned management strategy are important. Physical exclusion, habitat management, visual deterrents, and sound-based products can all have a place in an integrated bird-control program.

For growers considering sound-based options, Vegetable Growers Supply provides agricultural bird and pest deterrent products.

The most effective approach is not simply choosing the loudest or strongest deterrent. Instead, growers should understand the bird problem, monitor crop damage, use appropriate deterrents responsibly, and adjust the strategy as bird behavior changes.

With the right combination of prevention, monitoring, exclusion, and deterrence, growers can take proactive steps to reduce bird pressure and protect valuable crops throughout the growing season.

The Gathering for Open Agricultural Technology (GOAT), is hosting our biennial conference in South Carolina this year, and we would love to invite folks to be a part of it. You don't have to code to join us- you just have to be interested in the future of agricultural technology.

 We will gather December 7-11 in Seabrook Island, SC, USA

 GOAT brings together farmers, researchers, and technologists to explore and develop agricultural technologies that are open source, support data sovereignty, and are designed to be accessible, repairable, and useful for small-scale and sustainable farmers. 

 The conference is a four-day immersive experience where participants collaborate and co-create the agenda through an unconference format. The focus is on meaningful dialogue, shared learning, and building connections between people who do not often have the opportunity to sit at the same table. 

Whether participants are conservationists, technologists, researchers, or farmers, we come together around a shared interest in strengthening our land, food systems, and communities. 

 We do ask attendees to fill out an application so we can ensure we are assembling a vibrant and diverse range of attendees. 

 Travel support and attendance scholarships are available.

  Visit goatech.org to learn more and apply here. Early bird registration ends soon, so apply now!

We are farming australian teak with turmeric in one acre in organic way. Please suggest some organic fertilizer and herbicides which may work with the drip irrigation system.

I built a farm record-keeping app for smallholder farmers because I was tired of losing track of my own farm records

Hi everyone,

I'm a farmer based in Malawi. For years I kept my farm records on scraps of paper, in my head, or in a WhatsApp chat with myself. Feed costs, egg counts, which cow got which vaccine, what yield I got from that block of maize — it was always a mess by the end of the season.

I couldn't find a tool that fit how smallholder farmers actually work. Everything was either built for large commercial farms, needed constant internet, or cost money I didn't have.

So I built one. It's called My Farm Ledger.

What it does:

Tech notes for the crowd here:

Why I'm posting:

I've just released the first version. I've tested it with a handful of farmers locally, but I'd love feedback from this community — especially on the architecture and the offline-first approach.

It's free for 7 days, no signup. If you want to poke at it:

👉 https://my-farm-ledger-v1.chisaleterence.workers.dev/

Happy to answer anything about the build, the design decisions, or how it handles offline and data privacy. And if you're a farmer yourself, I'd love to hear what's missing.

Thanks 🙏

https://agrinexus.it

Engineers at North Dakota State University have developed and field-tested an autonomous mechanical weeding robot that achieved 96.5% weeding efficacy in sugar beet trials.

The system combines an Amiga robotic platform with a three-row cultivator featuring independently controlled sweep blades for precise, site-specific weed removal.

Using RTK-GPS, strain gauge load cells and laser distance sensors, the robot can adjust blade positioning and depth based on field conditions.

Trials showed that the system could achieve 50% weed coverage while reducing overall soil disturbance by 48.7% compared with less targeted cultivation.

The robot maintained an average tillage depth close to the 30-millimetre target, demonstrating precise mechanical control.

However, its current operating speed of about 0.5 metres per second remains a major limitation for large-scale commercial deployment.

Researchers see faster actuators, improved positioning updates and multiple robots working in parallel as key steps toward commercial-scale autonomous mechanical weeding.

A useful case study from Coggan Farms in Queensland shows why agricultural autonomy probably needs to be evaluated differently from conventional machinery.

During one winter harvest, Tom Coggan spent 18 hours operating the header while two SwarmFarm robots each completed another 18 hours of spraying. That produced 54 operating hours inside one 24-hour period.

It is sometimes summarised as “a week’s work in a day”, but I think the more useful interpretation is parallelisation rather than speed.

The robots were reported operating at roughly 8–9.5 km/h, so this was not about making a sprayer dramatically faster.

Coggan Farms already used camera-based spraying. Their remaining bottleneck was labour: keeping operators in two sprayers for long periods during busy seasons was difficult. Autonomy allowed spraying to continue while staff worked on harvest, maintenance and other farm jobs.

There are important caveats.

The farm had to improve paddock mapping, including boundaries, headlands and obstacles. Changing conditions could require maps to be updated. The robots also still required inspection, servicing and chemical/refill logistics.

That suggests a better autonomy business case should probably measure:

• autonomous operating hours per year
• human intervention hours
• hectares completed inside critical weather windows
• downtime and support requirements
• mapping and refill workload
• whether labour is genuinely released for other work

For large broadacre farms with repetitive jobs and labour constraints, that can be a very different equation from a smaller or highly fragmented property.

Coggan Farms was still publicly operating two SwarmFarm units in 2026 and adding automated refill capability, so this appears to have moved beyond an initial trial.

The broader lesson seems fairly practical: agricultural robots do not necessarily need to outperform a human-driven machine on instantaneous speed. They can create value by removing the requirement that every operating machine has a person continuously sitting in it.

Hello, everyone!

I’m working on a college assignment about MVPs and value proposition validation, and my group created a Landing Page as part of the project.

Important: this is only an academic simulation. AgroCorp is not a real company/product at this time.

If you are involved in the agriculture sector, could you visit the page and fill out the form? It only asks for your name, email, phone number, farm/property (it can be fictional), and a message.

Link: https://pedromarcusso.wixsite.com/agrocorp

It only takes a few minutes and would really help me with my assignment. Thank you!