CJP lied about Bengal - Stats says otherwise

[u/Epsilonice]

Courtesy: Kantaap @ Instagram

[u/protocolghost]

Defending the current CEC on party lines makes no sense for anyone who cares about free elections in India. Here are the facts on the ground:
West Bengal Voter Deletions: 9 million voters (12% of the electorate) were deleted during the SIR process. Of these, 63% were Hindu and 34% Muslim. Over 22 lakh affected voters filed formal appeals, with a 91% success rate proving how flawed the initial deletions were
.
Conflict of Interest in Sambhal: During the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, video footage showed police turned away and lathi-charged predominantly Muslim voters. The District Magistrate who dismissed these complaints was Manish Bansal the son-in-law of CEC Gyanesh Kumar.

Goa Rollback Lock: EROs verified hard documents for 97 rejected voters and approved their restoration, but were blocked because the ECINET software lacked a "rollback" feature to undo deletions.

Internal Dissent at the ECI: The two other Election Commissioners formally wrote 14 separate complaints between Oct 2025 and Aug 2026 against CEC Gyanesh Kumar's unilateral decision-making and mass voter removals.
This isn't about political bias. it's about holding constitutional institutions accountable. Place the country above party loyalty. (edited by chatgpt)

[u/protocolghost → u/protocolghost]

anyone can see a pattern here. He has to go, If you are a nationalist you should support this and protest against CEC.

[u/protocolghost → u/protocolghost]

also search in how laws were changed for selecting the Chief election commissioner and how new laws protect him. He has more immunity than our Prime Minsiter

[u/Epsilonice → u/protocolghost]

Thanks for bringing up the appointment laws and immunity, because you just walked into another massive historical and constitutional landmine.

You smugly ask to 'search how the laws were changed'. Let's actually look at the history:

• For 73 years (1950 to 2023): There was zero statutory law passed by Parliament under Article 324(2). Who appointed the CEC under decades of Congress rule? The Prime Minister alone. The ruling cabinet sent a single name to the President, rubber-stamped it, and installed their chosen bureaucrat.
• There was no search committee.
• There was zero consultation with the Leader of the Opposition.
• This is how Congress unilaterally appointed CECs for decades (including Navin Chawla, whom 180 MPs petitioned against for blatant partisan bias).
• What the 2023 Act Actually Did: For the first time in Indian history, Parliament passed a statutory law that mandated a statutory seat at the table for the Leader of the Opposition (Rahul Gandhi) alongside the Prime Minister and a Cabinet Minister.

The opposition spent 70 years unilaterally handpicking the CEC with zero transparency, but when a law finally mandates that the Leader of the Opposition sits on the selection panel, you pretend the PM having a hand in appointments is a 2023 invention.

Comparing the constitutional immunity of a quasi-judicial election referee to an elected political executive is peak comedy.

• Removal Protection Existed Since 1950: Under Article 324(5) drafted by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the CEC can only be removed through parliamentary impeachment by a two-thirds majority, the exact same bar as a Supreme Court judge. A Prime Minister can be removed by a simple 50% no-confidence vote tomorrow morning. The CEC was always designed to have greater structural removal security than the PM so that the executive couldn't fire the referee when losing.
• Section 16 (The Official Acts Protection): What the 2023 Act added under Section 16 is standard quasi-judicial protection: shielding Election Commissioners from civil and criminal proceedings for decisions made in the bona fide discharge of their official functions.

Do you understand why that exists? If an Election Commissioner could be slapped with local criminal FIRs for administrative election duties, every single losing political party and local goon in 543 constituencies would file malicious criminal cases in district courts to arrest and paralyze the referee before counting day.

[u/protocolghost → u/Epsilonice]

say i agree with you so the 91% were not accepted then it proofs itself the deletion is true. To the second point imagine in a basket there are 7 orange and 3 green icecream, if i remove certain percentage from them which icecream will be less represented in the basket, basic maths. 3 rd point i ll research more. Till now the other 2 ECs has not come in support of Mr Gyanesh, it shows they were really unhappy with all the single handed decision making done. Also look at Gyanesh kumar kerala incident google on it. That guys pattern is shady. Also about the laws to protect him why now ? what he is expecting he will get sued, what about other ECs he is not the only one. EC has to be truly independent just like our judiciary. All these evidences are more than enough to sack him. Government should actually create an enquiry committee and dig deep. Good night.

[u/Epsilonice → u/protocolghost]

Its okay its edited by GPT, at least the words are yours!

You brought numbers to the table, but you clearly didn't bother checking what they actually mean. Every single 'bombshell' in your comment collapses the second it meets elementary facts.

You claim: 'Over 22 lakh filed appeals with a 91% success rate proving deletions were flawed.'

• You fell hook, line, and sinker for a cherry-picked headline. The '91% restoration rate' was calculated from an initial sample of roughly 82,000 appeals disposed by tribunals, out of more than 22 lakh filed (less than 3.5% adjudicated at the time). Claiming 91% of all 22 lakh voters were restored is blatant fabrication.
• You literally stated that 63% of the deleted voters were Hindu and 34% Muslim. Think for ten seconds: if the ECI was executing a sinister communal conspiracy to disenfranchise opposition voters to hand West Bengal to the BJP, why would nearly two-thirds of the scrubbed names be HINDU? You just completely incinerated your own narrative about a targeted communal purge.

You bring up the Sambhal DM, Manish Bansal, being the CEC's son-in-law as 'proof' of an election-rigging family syndicate.

Do you know what the actual 2024 Lok Sabha result in Sambhal was?

• Ziaur Rehman Barq of the Samajwadi Party won the seat by a crushing margin of over 1,21,000 votes.
• If the DM was actively manipulating the election, abusing his police force, and disenfranchising Muslim voters to deliver the seat for his father-in-law's political masters, how did the INDIA bloc candidate win by one of the largest SP margins in western Uttar Pradesh?

In an electorate of nearly 12 lakh voters in Goa, you are citing an IT interface limitation involving literally 97 voters.

• The local Electoral Registration Officers cleared 97 challenged names, encountered an architectural lack of a reverse-toggle in the ECINET module before the roll freeze, and poll officials immediately handed them Form 6 to register them into the supplementary roll.
• An edge-case software workflow bug affecting ninety-seven individuals is an administrative fix, not a nationwide constitutional conspiracy to destroy democracy.

You repeat the headline about '14 internal objections' between commissioners.

• The Election Commission was deliberately structured by Parliament as a multi-member body under Article 324 precisely so that three independent commissioners could debate, push back, and dissent on draft guidelines.
• When the statutory notifications and final orders for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) were executed, they were issued with collective institutional sanction.
• If internal dissent was evidence of illegality, every Supreme Court minority opinion and every Cabinet debate would be a crime.

You tried to dress up WhatsApp conspiracy points with numbers, but all you did was misrepresent statistics, cite a constituency where the opposition won by 1.2 lakh votes, and prove that two-thirds of West Bengal's deleted voters were Hindu.

Placing country above party starts with placing facts above propaganda.