Both are not mutually exclusive genius both can happen at the same time. People can change who they vote for ofcourse they can, but it doens't mean that fraud voters add nahi hue and real voters delete nahi hue
Saying 'itâs not hard to imagine' and 'both could happen' isnât an argument, itâs pure fanfiction.
Youâve gone from claiming statistical proof, to 'just imagine it', to a desperate retreat into 'well, theoretically both can happen simultaneously!' When you have to rely on hypothetical possibilities because you don't have a single scrap of empirical proof, youâve already lost the debate.
Letâs dismantle your 'fake voters added, real voters deleted' fairy tale...
You seem to think the BJP has a magic portal where they press a button and phantom names appear on the roll.
In the real world, the Special Summary Revision of Electoral Rolls is executed on the ground by Booth Level Officers (BLOs).
Who are BLOs in West Bengal? State government employees, municipal workers, and local government school teachers.
Under whose administrative apparatus do they work daily? The State Government.
Are you seriously suggesting that West Bengalâs own state machinery and state employees actively conspired to delete TMCâs voters and manufacture lakhs of phantom voters for the BJP right under the nose of Nabanna?
Matter of fact, Didi was the one who gave free ration card, aadhar card and all the necessary documents to Bangladeshis. There's a place in the heart of Kolkata, Park Circus, this place is flooded by illegal Bangladeshis. Almost everyday police came of detention here.
Congratulations, you just downgraded from a political debate to fortune-cookie philosophy.
âTwo things can occur at the same timeâ is a lesson in kindergarten modal logic, not proof of electoral fraud.
Here is an actual lesson in logic for you: Possibility is not actuality.
It is logically possible that it rains while the sun shines.
It is logically possible that a meteor lands in your backyard while you type your next comment.
That does not mean you are currently standing in an asteroid crater.
In the real world, when you accuse an election of being rigged, you don't get to say 'well, theoretically both things could coexist in the multiverse.' You need empirical evidence. You need to show where, how, and who.
Notice what you just did:
You completely ignored that BLOs are West Bengal state government employees.
You completely ignored that Form 7 objections require statutory verification on the ground.
You completely ignored that TMCâs own booth agents never filed mass objections against phantom additions across 80,000 booths.
You abandoned your data. You abandoned your claims. And now youâre hiding behind a one-line platitude because you donât have a single document, a single constituency, or a single fact to back up your fantasy.
Saying 'itâs theoretically possible' without a shred of proof isn't logic, it's the universal white flag of someone who has completely run out of arguments.
2
u/chestnut909 12h ago
Both are not mutually exclusive genius both can happen at the same time. People can change who they vote for ofcourse they can, but it doens't mean that fraud voters add nahi hue and real voters delete nahi hue