Still gets its love, its just that mecha stuff is niche nowadays. Thus its falloff near the tailend of PS3, not just the massive shift to focus on the souls projects.
Tbh, I see little reason to separate the souls/ring games. The only game that’s kinda different is sekuro, but it slaps. Ironically the only souls game that’s kinda mid is 2, and by normal standards the game is actually pretty good, just not as good as 1, nowhere near 3 (imo the best souls game). But even if it’s not my favorite, blood borne is a masterpiece, same with Elden ring. I have little to no experience with sekiro, but I know it’s good.
Sure. But realise most of the people avoiding it because its not what they like about dark souls wont be in that category. That is the point of this thread.
That literally makes no sense. Dark Souls and The Duskbloods are not the same franchise. Why would the expectation be for them to be the same?! By that logic Fable deserves criticism for not having any similarity to Forza (they are from the same studio after all)
Yep and you can still replay those games and still have a great time. They’re about longevity, not “shit I beat this, what’s next????” Game development is super in depth, and they tried something different with Nightreign. I have no idea anything about Duskbloods, but obviously that’s not their Flagship game.
1.1k
u/parkourdude231 Aug 29 '26
https://giphy.com/gifs/l49JKCSoloVTGjmWQ