I originally meant this as a comment on pofffffff's submission a couple hours ago, but it got so stupidly long that it could only merit its own post. I am very passionate about clothing, and I want to lay out why I think Charles is not only one of the best dressed monarchs, but easily one of the best dressed people alive.

I consider clothing to be a matter of three dimensions:

1. Personal expression

2. Practicality

3. Respect/Tradition

Dimension 1 is the easy one, it’s just personal taste, what qualities in oneself one aims to express. King Charles III has, in my opinion, impeccable taste. The clothes he wears always looks well, considered and always done perfectly, not flamboyantly, just perfectly: never a wonky tie knot, tasteful fabrics, always clothes in proper fit (far rarer than one would expect) and whatever other detail there can be. Botherless perfection on this front.

I think King Charles has 2 down as well for a few reasons, on the one hand because he can afford the practical option of clothing - no messing around with penny price, straitjacket-like suits when you have a Savile Row tailor. But it isn't just a matter of what money can buy, take even the Prince of Wales: he simply doesn't sit in his clothes with the same ease as his Majesty (or is it just me?). Someone who throws the tie and jacket as soon as he isn’t forced to is evidently not as well seated in them as someone who doesn't. The King is the epitome of the latter. His clothes are elegant, but never stuffy – just by eye I can see that those suits of his are no less comfortable than the sweatpants and hoodies so many run around in these days. This owes largely to the proper fit mentioned earlier.

quick tip for you gentlemen, an easy hack for picking a well-fitting suit/clothes is to see if the waist is consistent. Anatomy dictates that we have one waistline of course, and very handy of English tailoring is that literally every item has a waistline, but if you don’t pay attention, each item may have a waistline in radically different places. Remember, the waistband of the trousers, the waist button of the jacket (top one on a two-button jacket), waist button on a waistcoat (typically the second-last) and the sixth button of your shirt should be practically overlapping. Ignore at own risk!

Finally, there is 3; really the purpose of the clothing - what’s behind it. The King has elegance, but not vanity, that isn't the point. Nor is it because he is always strictly obligated.
He dresses out of respect:

Respect for Occasion
Respect for Heritage
Respect for Environment

In an age where it is so common and so acceptable to demonstrate no respect for any situation or to anyone, where anything but an apathetic appearance comes only as a conscious choice, he does not yield his own dignity (respect for himself), and he does not yield his respect for others.

Heritage is an oh so important part of the equation which is so often overlooked, particularly in occidental European clothing. It just so happens that the English tradition of clothing has been adopted as cosmopolitan formalwear, so it’s easy for this quality of the King to go unnoticed. But it shouldn't.

As we are a crowd of monarchists, I reckon that it's hardly necessary to preach the virtues of tradition, but I must underline that the way we dress is the front line, the very face of our heritage. King Charles III not sacrificing the conventions of English style – almost always wearing a tie, always a jacket, properly buttoned, heading any dress code without fault (also far rarer than one would expect) – is underappreciated, as it is nothing short of majestic. It is particularly notable when he is representing the far less globalised Scottish culture. In his kilt and Argyll jacket he shows clearly his respect for the heritage of his realms.

My final point is his respect for the environment.
I don't just mean nature, but how respectfully dressed he always is towards his surroundings, whatever that may be. There is a fallacious belief around that one's self-expression is solely an internal matter. The thing is, we don't exist in invisible bubbles – when we are in an environment, we BECOME a part of that environment, and that is so very very important to remember. I am native to the beautiful nature of the Kent Downs and love to go on walks. While taking in the scenery, if someone walks by wearing a neon-orange graphic T-shirt, they can be as self-satisfied as they like, but they are subtracting from the environment. Being wary of this, like King Charles III is, is an honourable show of respect. I mean, just look at the pictures of him: He always looks like he belongs there, that he is not only no subtraction, but indeed an addition to the environment.

I have never read his book "A Vision of Britain" as much as I mean to someday, but by my understanding, his (and failing that, MY) vision is of a country where our heritage is not a museum piece, but a part of who and how we are, a country where we respect our environments and recognise our place in, not on it, a country where beauty and elegance doesn't yield to crude functionalism. I have always heard this in the context of architecture, but really it is the exact same principle with clothing, I just think we notice this principle more with buildings due to their slower circulation - we can appreciate the loss of elegant, traditional architecture because we see it in the flesh all over, while clothing can disappear overnight and out of sight.

Christ, I didn't realise how much I had to say and how much I appreciated his Majesty before I started writing this, it all just fell out of me.

I urge you to learn from his Majesty King Charles III of Windsor.

God save the King.

^{The annual address by Queen Nga Wai Hono i te Po reaffirms the Kingitanga’s enduring commitment to Maaori empowerment, respectful engagement with Pacific leadership, and constructive partnership with Aotearoa-NZ's institutions including government and community organisations.}

^{Courtesy : Kingiitanga | Instagram - Above in english translation of speech}