8
u/Both_Yoghurt1437 7h ago
What on God's green flat earth is happening here?
6
u/Johnatron2000 6h ago
It’s obvious. If the roadster was sent into “space” it would hit the firmament. This is more like a white lie to help spacex
3
5
u/Equivalent-Wait3533 6h ago
Lol what's the next theory? That Starship is a CGI rocket, just like the people who appear at the launches?
0
u/Admirable_Ground_163 5h ago
More like a giant helium filled canister with loud speakers and spotlights attached to steam machines, and yes, CGI. The Earth is flat, so it isn't a rocket for going to space.
2
u/Equivalent-Wait3533 5h ago
What a mediocre programmer, creating such a stupid bot that's easy to identify.
0
3
3
u/convert_kyleigh47 5h ago
cant tell if this is a bot or just someone having a rough morning honestly
0
u/Admirable_Ground_163 4h ago
How serendipitous. I was just thinking of that scene from the Animatrix where the robot follows the woman back to the lab and they are discussing it's conversion. I was thinking, "I wonder if I will get any flat earth converts today"? And I thought of that line in the movie, "To convert is it's choice to make", and then I saw your comment, and noticed your user name. I am not a bot, but I have lived on the flat earth for 42 years and most people still thing it's a globe, so not only am I having a rough morning, but I am having a rough existence.
4
2
2
1
1
1
u/KaseyNPa 4h ago
Dammit! I came here hoping to be the pivot person in a hate Elon circle jerk and all I get is this crap? WTF
1
u/Eastern_Ad_3512 4h ago
“Globe earther” wtf nevet heard of that. 🤣🤣🤣 is that what flat earth believers call normal people?
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 4h ago
Yes. Welcome to the Flat Earth, my friend!
1
u/Eastern_Ad_3512 3h ago
Oh okay. How does my starlink work if this dude is lying?
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 3h ago
I don't know. We haven't figured it all out yet. They have been lying about the Earth for 500 years. Do you enjoy starlink? I know a few people who have it where I live near Glacier Park.
2
u/Eastern_Ad_3512 3h ago
Ye its great. I bought it for a property where i couldn’t have gotten any other internet services and i have a faster internet and more stable than with Tmobile in NYC. Its insane!!
1
1
u/WaterPog 2h ago
Have you ever seen tropic thunder, there's a good lesson in that movie I think you could benefit from.
1
u/DMmeurdankstockpics 7h ago
So this sub is a flat earth sub now?
I don't get it
0
u/digitaldisorder_ 6h ago
OP is trying to say the object that can be monitored from the day of deployment back in 2018, say, through https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/ and other independent sources, is not a roadster and is instead a large chunk of something else floating out there. i mean, a car or something with properties like the roadster was sent into heliocentric orbit. not sure why it matters if it was a car or something else. something was sent into orbit from the falcon. we can track it. it's up to you to believe if it was a roadster or something that produced the same light curve or visual signature that didn't deviate over the last 9 years. but, what would be the point be of not using a roadster? it would be like telling everyone i threw a football over the fence in the backyard, but, actually threw a rock.
4
u/mynameistory 6h ago
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 6h ago
I am sure it looks exactly like that, because it is CGI.
3
u/mynameistory 6h ago
CGI is so old school man, we're doing AI slop these days. Get with the times.
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 6h ago
You are right, this is a pretty old meme.
2
2
u/DMmeurdankstockpics 6h ago
Yeah I'm pretty sure its a roadster as is the rest of the world, not much of a conspiracy here to see.
Not much of a post at all really.
-1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 6h ago
No, not at all. I am saying there is nothing up there, and for 56 million dollars a day, they are transmitting false data to mock people into believing the Earth is a Globe, and that Elon Musk is in on it.
3
1
1
u/DMmeurdankstockpics 6h ago
$56 million per day? Jesus they're getting destroyed.
I will do it for $55 million per day and I will throw in one free day per year.
1
1
u/konjou-80 6h ago
Did musk launch the promised car that was for eberhard because he designed it,because musk hated to do so, yes
6
1
1
1
u/DBDude 6h ago
Moon landing conspiracy wasn’t enough for you guys?
2
u/Admirable_Ground_163 6h ago
Enough for US? Elon has a trillion dollars and NASA gets 56 million per day, and you are calling us us greedy?
1
u/OwlsHootTwice 5h ago
Falcon Heavy has had 13 launches since the roadster went up, including three this year, and all have successfully delivered payloads to space.
The Nancy Grace Roman space telescope, launched last month, is on route to the Sun/Earth L2 point about a million miles from earth where it will do deep sky observations looking for exoplanets.
2
u/Admirable_Ground_163 5h ago
It's not Heavy, but it is a con. They are really good at faking it, they have it down to a science.
1
u/OwlsHootTwice 5h ago
You yourself could track them with an easy to obtain telescope and do the measurements yourself as to how far away they are. But then that would require critical thinking
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 5h ago
It is very easy to observe these objects in the sky, no doubt. The doubt arises when it is assumed that they are satellites. Objects in orbit are supposedly about 200 miles up.
Do you really think that you can see an object the size of a school bus from 200 miles away in the blackness of night? Could it be that the objects are much lower and are something else that they are not telling us?
Since the Earth is Flat and motionless, they can't be in orbit, so what could it be?
2
u/Next_Instruction_528 5h ago
"Since the Earth is Flat and motionless, they can't be in orbit, so what could it be? "
Oh so you're actually insane. You should lead with that next time
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 5h ago
Maybe the objects that you can track were already moving up there for a long time and they just assigned them a name.
2
u/OwlsHootTwice 5h ago
That’s easy enough to verify too. The sky has been photographed for 150 years now. Compare two photos and see that there’s new objects now. Objects that correspond to satellites placed in specific orbits and launched on well known dates. The math isn’t that hard.
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 5h ago edited 5h ago
Yeah, that is how you could verify it. Still wouldn't prove that what you are seeing is a satellite though, it just proves that the object that you are seeing is what they want you to think it is, not what it actually is, which are highly likely two different things. Have you seen the Neutral Buoyancy Lab? They film the "space walks" in a swimming pool.
1
u/OwlsHootTwice 1h ago
Doesn’t matter what it is or what you want to name them. The point is that astronomers photographed the entirety of the sky starting in the 19th century, frequently using the large telescopes that were built, and then analyzed those photos and catalogued the heavens. Then in 1957 additional objects began appearing, objects that were launched from the ground and placed in various orbits. The only new things being added to the heavens were added by humans
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 5h ago
The sky has been photographed for 150 years yet somehow they can't film 24 hour 4k Livestream from the space station or a continuous no-cut shot from the ground, to space and back down to the ground.
1
u/LegendTheo 4h ago
You should ask musk to publish the full uncut footage from one or two of the cameras on ship from its last flight. That would be an uncut shot from earth to orbit and back.
I bet SpaceX would do it. They only cut those shots to show other things after all.
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 4h ago
We have been asking for 12 years. Nasa and SpaceX both. Are ye' new to the flat and motionless plane?
1
u/LegendTheo 4h ago
The only vehicle capable of an uncut video is Starship as everything else we've put into orbit loses connection during re-entry.
Starship finally was put into a stable orbit a few weeks ago. That's the one to ask about, since they streamed uncut video from the whole flight.
Although, to be honest, I'm not sure what you think "cutting" is doing to any of the starship launches. If the views they're showing were being faked, they'd have to be CGI. No amount of cutting is going to allow you to do a physical effect for re-entry visuals.
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 4h ago
So there is an uncut 4k video from the ground to re-entry? They could shoot a continuous shot from the capsule and upload it after as well to get the whole shot.
→ More replies (0)
0
u/BlueHairEater 6h ago
Okay, this is the ONE thing about spacex i don’t believe. We’ve never broken the firmament and have never been to “space”. Of course it’s all fake!
0
0
u/dr_patso 6h ago
It was all live steamed? I mean I get thinking this is bogus esp with musk involved but it’s actually super easy and they needed a dummy payload for the falcon heavy test.
That match up is the inside of the fairing that also went to space, the light reflection is because they legit put lights to illuminate the payload.. you’d see a dark blob and earth otherwise.
2
u/Admirable_Ground_163 6h ago
I watched the live stream of the WR speedrun of Super Mario Bros, was it being live streamed from the Mushroom Kingdom?
0
u/dr_patso 6h ago
That “studio evidence” you provided from the “studio” is literally the inside of the fairing that encapsulates the payload on ascent. I’d love to find out this was all staged but it’s just not. It’s easy shit for them. The Tesla is like a fraction of the heavy’s payload capacity.
1
u/Admirable_Ground_163 6h ago
Encapsulates the payload in the studio. I don't really think you would love to find out this was all fake, because it is, and you are saying it's real.


24
u/Greenman8907 6h ago
Should’ve sent a cybertruck up there.
As a warning to any species out there to avoid this planet.