r/ECE • u/ExpensiveTip1608 • Apr 08 '26
CAREER Best ECE specialization for someone who aspires to be a grouchy old man?
I’m an electrical and computer engineering student trying to plan my long-term career (very long-term, like 20+ years). I want to pick one specialization, learn it well, and then completely stop evolving. Ideally, I’d like to keep using the same tools, same workflow, and same opinions for decades while younger coworkers slowly lose their minds trying to get me to update anything.
An ideal specialization would change as slowly as possible (or not at all), reward a 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' mentality, let me say things like 'we've always done it this way', and be hard to replace with AI. Bonus points if I can complain about modern tools and reject new standards on principle.
Right now I’m considering things like power or RF, but I’d love to hear from people in the field.
Thanks in advance.
59
u/StageMajestic613 Apr 09 '26
RF definitely. I’ve been at it 30 years and they put me in my own lab so my cynicism doesn’t spread.
16
u/m-in Apr 09 '26
RF is kind of ruthless. Success is measured. Yeah, a cliche, so what. You can think whatever you want, but the test gear has the final say and doesn’t give a fuck. It can sure turn one cynical, no surprise there.
You sort of can fake your way out of a box in some areas of engineering but RF isn’t really one of them.
8
u/Captainj2001 Apr 09 '26
I got out of RF so I wouldn't have to spend the next 25 years in the lab once I realized that is what happens.
1
u/answerguru Apr 09 '26
I did it for a decade and loved the lab work!
2
u/Captainj2001 Apr 09 '26
I admire you for your dedication to the craft! I still may get back into RF at some point in the future but my lab is now in my home for the most part so no VNAs at my disposal! Still doing highspeed digital and putting my knowledge to use in PCBs but nothing as serious as the RF projects I worked on in the past.
2
u/StageMajestic613 Apr 09 '26
LOL I have a VNA and spectrum analyzer at home, amongst other things; all HP & Tek.
2
28
u/Dependent_Bit7825 Apr 09 '26
Power systems. Get a job at a utility. Grow a gut. One and done.
10
u/flinxsl Apr 09 '26
Definitely this. With electronics you have to adapt and react to economic trends. Power is entrenched in the Government and highly resistant to change.
18
u/MSECE Apr 09 '26
RF is fast moving unlike what many say however that’s primarily on the transmitter or receiver side.
Power distribution is probably the slowest moving I can think of.
Government work is also pretty slow depending on what you go into
3
u/OhmmOhmmOhmm Apr 09 '26
What do you mean by that? I'm fairly young in the field, and I see phased arrays and massive mimo as some of the more system-level innovations being implemented, and some material science changes for actually changing what is feasible operating frequencies, but what is changing in tx/rx? Just curious cause I've taken a slower job and am not see anything crazy atm.
5
u/flinxsl Apr 09 '26
software defined radio is becoming more viable in more applications as the data converters and computers become more efficient.
3
2
u/MSECE Apr 09 '26
Mainly Quantum Sensors for instance Rydberg Atom Receivers and Quantum Magnetometry
Also some changes from digital signal processing back to analog neuromorphic processing to improve SWAP-C
That’s probably enough to keep you busy for awhile
17
u/trophosphere Apr 09 '26
RF has been pretty fast moving from what I've seen in industry. Analog especially in the realm of Metrology is much more slower paced. The HP/Agilent/Keysight 3458A 8.5 digit multimeter still remains supreme.
8
3
u/dsrmpt Apr 09 '26
The HP days were better. We had VFD screens, none of this LCD crap!
Seriously though, the fact that I know the model numbers of some of these meters tells ya something.
10
u/NewSchoolBoxer Apr 09 '26
Specializations are marketing gimmicks to lure students. They mean nothing, you get the same degree. I put electives into what I liked and only used 10% of my degree on the job. Way more important is landing an internship or co-op in any branch of EE. I interned in power and almost every company wanted to interview me after that, not just power.
There's no guarantees either. You can't guarantee a job in an area you like.
4
u/SlipPlaneSurfer Apr 09 '26
Power is probably your best bet if that’s the goal, utilities and industrial power systems move slow, and you’ll still find guys working off standards and practices that haven’t changed much in decades. Protection, substation design, and grid work especially tend to favor proven methods over constant reinvention, so it’s one of the few areas where “we’ve always done it this way” actually flies in real projects.
5
u/QuakingQuakersQuake Apr 09 '26
I'm just commenting to be able to come back to this easier, because I need the answers too
1
2
u/SlipperyRoobs Apr 09 '26
Anecdotally, from my experience board-level RF with defense/aerospace leanings has had the crustiest engineers with a weird chip on their shoulder. Some other people I have talked to have observed the same. It's weird..
Grid scale power (not power electronics) is probably the actual slowest moving.
2
u/gimpwiz Apr 09 '26
Definitely analog. Could be RF, front-ends for data acquisition, large-scale power electronics, etc. I think you'd be a solid fit for mil-tech. Highly classified stuff that gets approved through a political process and then committed to for the next fifteen years.
I also recommend coming up with a very strange but harmless conspiracy theory. Talk about it at modest length no more than twice a year. Nothing easily disprovable or stupid like hollow earth mole men type stuff, and nothing that relies on an unidentified or awkward THEM to make work. Keep that theory knocking about for the next twenty years.
3
u/hanjh Apr 09 '26
If you want to learn one thing and then never change or learn anything else, I’d recommend getting out of engineering now.
Major in some regulated field like healthcare or law. Engineers need to always be leveling up their skills and learning new domains. Employees with your mindset drag down teams.
14
u/Character-Company-47 Apr 09 '26
You think healthcare and law isn’t changing 😭, or that engineering isn’t regulated
5
u/klishaa Apr 09 '26
this is such a bs comment. healthcare and law are also changing constantly. in fact most fields are. idk how specializing equates to “learn one thing then never change.” i have a family member in a specialized field of medicine and she is constantly learning about new medications and treatments.
2
u/Aristoteles1988 Apr 09 '26
I hope ur not referring to tax law
We have changes every single f***n year
1
u/JonnyJalebi Apr 09 '26
I agree with you this, and I am sad to say I had this mentality going into and out of college. With the internet and AI, there is little reason to not have a dynamic skillset adapting to what you are working in. There are definitely fundamentals that an engineer has to be strong in but you have to be prepared to be able to learn "any topic" (within reason) whether it's through reading textbooks outside of work, additional programing languages, etc.
1
1
1
1
u/idiotsecant Apr 10 '26
Power generation, transmission, and distribution. By a mile. It's glorious.
1
u/FredeJ Apr 10 '26
Antennas. The dark arts. The nerds in the corner no one will disturb. The ones who are always right but you never understand why.
1
u/macegr Apr 11 '26
I think there's room in switching power converter design. You could adopt one of the newer technologies like GaN or SiC or even newer, and stick with that for about 30 years letting it become the old tech along with you. Best part is power supply design requires an old fart to really tune the efficiency, and the demand is always there from mobile devices to computers to vehicles.
1
u/Markietas Apr 12 '26
"I want to pick one specialization, learn it well, and then completely stop evolving."
On one hand, I applaud your self awareness.
But this attitude WILL severely limit you. And I actually think it will greatly increase the chances that you get replaced by AI.
There are definitely some segments of engineering that move slower than others, as some other commenters has pointed out, power is a decent contender.
But whether we like it or not, with all the new AI tools you're either going to learn how to use them to become more efficient at your job, or you're going to get replaced (especially if we're talking long term here).
1
u/SiliconChipDV Apr 12 '26
Pure traditional Electrical engineering which is power system engineering. If you get into electric power generation and distribution, you should be safe with same job for next 100 years.
1
u/minhbui27 Apr 29 '26
There is a professor at my school who I really like talking to who I would say fits your description. He does VLSI and has been for probably longer than I've been alive. Now sure, there have been advancements and changes in silicon semicomductors design, but realistically companies remain hard-working to keep CMOS alive. I think the neat trick is that although these tools will no doubt get better with time, only a handful (i mean 2) companies supply software for all major semiconductor design houses, so the tricks that you learn, you will still need to use until silicon CMOS dies, which I still find hard to believe.
65
u/AiandisI Apr 08 '26
I’d have to say specialty engineering in the aerospace field. Go work for one of the primes and you can spend the next 30 years retired in place. Plenty of youngsters to yell at for not doing things exactly the same as we did in the 90s too