r/CryptoCurrency • u/WorryDesigner8152 • 2d ago
DISCUSSION Crypto has a problem we keep calling “user error” instead of actually fixing.
Imagine explaining crypto to someone who’s never used it.
“Okay, first make sure you’re using the right network. Double-check the wallet address. Don’t lose your recovery phrase. Be careful what you sign. And if you mess up, your money might be gone forever.”
Then we wonder why the average person would rather just use their bank. 😭
Don’t get me wrong. The whole point of crypto is being able to control your own money without relying on a middleman. That’s a pretty powerful idea.
But there’s a difference between giving people financial freedom and expecting everyone to become a cybersecurity expert just to send $100.
We’re making progress with things like transaction previews, spending limits, and better wallet recovery options. Even Ethereum researchers are working on ways to make signed transactions safer.
But I think the industry still has a long way to go.
Here’s what I’m curious about:
If you could fix ONE thing about crypto to make ordinary people actually comfortable using it, what would it be?
And please don’t just say “make the price go up” 😂
3
u/Pristine-Bee-269 2d ago
After so many years, defi still get hacked, exchanges still get hacked. Now even "Not your keys, not your coins" is not 100% true anymore. I feel the security aspect is really moving backwards.
And without the crazy altseason like last time, the risk reward in crypto is no longer attractive and i will never introduce any new people to come into crypto.
2
u/LilAstra 🟩 0 / 0 🦠 2d ago
Satoshi should give every body that wants it 20$ in btc if they figure out how to receive it
Would give us some kind off mass adoption
3
u/WorryDesigner8152 2d ago
imagine offering someone $20 in free bitcoin and they need a 45-minute tutorial just to receive it 😭 that’s probably the best crypto usability test i’ve ever heard of
2
u/truecakesnake 2d ago
We need to make using crypto as easy as using a bank, not the other way around.
2
u/AlpineGuy 🟩 0 / 0 🦠 1d ago
The whole point was never to be your own bank but to have an electronic cash system without a central authority and no double-spend. So basically properties of cash, just online.
The basic idea still works: Create a wallet on your computer and you can receive + spend the coins.
The problem is cybersecurity really. There are so many vectors to attack this through software, hardware, networks, etc.
And the problem with cybersecurity is that in the de-centralized world the security relies on a few unpaid volunteers and underpaid researchers while the attackers have the incentive of potentially becoming millionaires. Centralized providers can have highly paid security experts around the clock and bug bounties.
If you could fix ONE thing about crypto to make ordinary people actually comfortable using it, what would it be?
The whole user interface would need to become a lot more simpler. No more 26 character addresses. No more fake transactions. Automatic filtering of spam. A central authority that keeps track of spam/scam/fraud/crime addresses and filters them out (though that's a danger for neutrality, of course). So basically identities that cannot be faked. It needs to be absolutely clear who the money is going to.
2
u/BILLYBUTCHER_2 1d ago
If sending $100 requires someone to understand networks, gas fees, seed phrases and transaction approvals, the UX still isn't there 😂. Security shouldn't depend on every user being a cybersecurity expert. Better warnings, readable transaction previews and safer recovery options would make a real difference.
1
1
1
u/Patrick_Atsushi 🟩 0 / 0 🦠 1d ago
I make use of exchanges & banks as long as needed, and move it to cold wallet on demand.
Instead of getting the worst side of the both, why not just enjoy the benefits of them?
1
u/Good-Book-6912 🟩 0 / 0 🦠 1d ago
I don't wonder why people would rather just use their bank, because the bank is usually the best option when they want to buy something. A swipe if a card and the purchase is done. Super easy. What would they use crypto for?
1
u/thistimelineisweird 🟩 3K / 3K 🐢 2d ago
99.9% of people just want their banks to stop sucking. 0.1% of people care about self custody. I'm probably being generous on that 0.1%, too.
If I could fix crypto, it would be global adoption by banks for faster and potentially cheaper services for the 99.9%.
Ordinary people will use it without ever knowing they're using it, thus the risk is passed on to the institutions and not an individual.
I don't care if I am wrong about the 99.9% / 0.1% number here. The point is very few people care about self custody. It's a nice feature but not the most important.
1
u/WorryDesigner8152 2d ago
that’s a fair point. most people probably don’t care who holds the keys as long as their money is safe and easy to use. crypto still has a long way to go before self-custody feels like an upgrade instead of extra homework 😂
1
u/AlpineGuy 🟩 0 / 0 🦠 1d ago
Online banks have come a long way and are now much faster and easier. In Europe transactions can be instant from one account to another. I think here the point of crypto for people is really the fear of government access to funds - so self-custody. We have seen that happening before.
1
u/thistimelineisweird 🟩 3K / 3K 🐢 1d ago
An important distinction of safety is who assumes risk. Banks are fdic insured in the states. I'm sure probably similar rules exist in other places. More options for some form of monetary recovery in the event of a loss over self-custody.
14
u/restore_democracy 🟩 0 / 0 🦠 2d ago
Everyone wants to be their own banker. Turns out banking requires lots of experts and controls.