The government really making our lives more affordable with these stupid strategies.

So then how do you account for their promises to EXPAND social services?

Seems pretty quiet here today. Mods should have a look at the super posters who vanished as soon as the Russian bot farm was taken down.

We took the future away from our young generation, making it unaffordable for them to own a home, own a car and being able to start a family. They now have to do that until much further in life. This happened because of policies our government made. In order for young generations to catch up and improve their chances to own a home and start a family I think we should entirely cut taxes on income for ages 18-30. This extra money they keep in their pocket should allow them to invest into their future. Their future is this country's future.

This isn't racism. It's prejudice. And it's right.

I'm Islamophobic. Not because I was born that way. Not because my parents raised me to "hate Muslims". I don't hate them. I'm Islamophobic because I have two eyes, two ears, and I value living in a high-trust society.

I came by my prejudice through my own lived experiences and observations and, like Katy, concluded Islam is not compatible with Western values.

Of course, there's a large swath of Canadians who would already consider what I've written here hate speech. Some may call those people leftists, or woke, but I believe that indirect labels are an obstacle to understanding. I call them post-modernists—because at their core, these people believe that the truth is subjective and up to interpretation. This is why they can call themselves Red Tories one second, and deny that a woman is an adult human female the next.

One of the worst things post-modernists (pomos) have done is brainwashed themselves into believing that all prejudice is a moral failure and that all discrimination is an objective evil. This is because they believe what they are told will make them sound the most virtuous: that diversity is Canada's greatest strength—minus the privileged founding peoples, and also Jews if they support Israel (this arrived in the 2023 Queers for Palestine Expansion Pack).

But prejudice is not a moral failure. Discrimination is not an objective evil. These are natural blockades to cultures that would demand our conversion, destroy our institutions, and do us harm. The shared prejudice of a nation keep that nation safe—and as Quebec has inspiringly proven, also maintains culture and character.

It is a natural right to form and hold negative opinions about the philosophies and cultures that our eyes, ears, and very essences tell us are a danger to public safety and social cohesion. It is ok to expect assimilation of those who have lived here for years while benefiting from our society.

Our governments admit the danger we are in every day through their actions. Look around the waterfront or the public square in your city. Look for the anti-terror bollards, the thousands of little monuments to the folly of inclusion and mass migration. This is how governments and the private market attempt to solve a problem we never had before the pomo "centre/left" began conflating all prejudice with racism.

To paraphrase Edmund Burke, the vacuum left by our discarded prejudices have been filled with danger. We amongst increasing islamism, criminal gangs like Bishnoi, and sectarian conflict over Punjab. To call it "racist" or "unacceptable" to point out the real dangers these things pose is something out of 1984.

We can't stop David Eby from calling for Marrifield's resignation. But we can ask the Doerkson campaign to stand by her remarks. Hopefully other conservatives stand by her as well.

If you're a voter in BC and you agree with what I've written here, consider writing a few words of support to the campaign.

If we deserve safety in our own communities; if we want our children to inherit our institutions, our rights, and our provincial cultures; if we want to be a nation instead of a post-national state, then we must defend our prejudices and those whom express them.

Perhaps more importantly, we must defend the very concept of prejudice itself.

Another beaming immigrant from the Trudeau era.

What's the point of Conservatives winning if they're just going to do the conservative version of Boomer Luxury Socialism? If the seniors of BC built the province as Lorne claims (they didn't, they inherited it), then they built the province with unsustainable debt, "too few" long term beds, and MAID. Should they not be left to enjoy the fruit of their labour?

70% of all new medical spending already goes to seniors in a province with one of the lowest total fertility rates in North America. Seniors have outsized control over local budgets and housing in most communities due to uneven age distribution. Instead of voting locally to reduce spending, they demand a tax deferment program subsidized by those still earning a pay cheque.

I know the NDP are about 100x worse. But what Lorne is offering here is still Vampire Economics, and it's going to leave the few children that are born in BC saddled by debt if it continues.

At what point do the under 50s form a political party aimed at politically disenfranchising seniors? It may be the only way to stop this madness.

Adam Van Koeverden is a wacko.

So here in BC we have a public car insurance company called ICBC, it is the only legal entity allowed to sell car insurance and you must pay for them to drive a car.

In real life, almost everybody I know hates ICBC. Despite the low rates, they famously rarely if ever actually pay you out, and you spend a shit ton of money typically suing them, despite that, the NDP made it recently so that in most cases no one is at fault and you can't sue them, and the fact that it is a government run monopoly means they don't have to try. Personally, I am fine with a public option, but I would also like some private compitition, which they have in Quebec and they have the lowest rates.

Yet, if you go to places like the British Columbia subs and such, you'd think I was a madman for daring to say we shouldn't all have to legally pay into a for profit corp. I even gave a guy once I was arguing with non monopolic solutions to keep interest rates down and he kept saying "so you want interest rates to go up?"

Like what's the point of cheap insurance if they just don't pay you out like a private corp?

I know years ago Trudeau fucked us so we can’t share news articles on social media.

Yesterday I tried to view an article written by an international news organization that was posted on their FB page.

I got the pop up in the photo when I tried to access it.

I don’t really look at a lot of news on social media and I don’t really look at different organizations. I mostly follow friends or dog accounts. So if this isn’t new I was unaware til yesterday.

My recollection of the law that was passed was about preventing sharing of Canadian news on SM bc it couldn’t be monetized and our Cdn MSM wasn’t making any money and this was done under the guise of helping the bottom line for floundering Cdn media.

When did we start blocking people’s access to entire social media accounts for NON CANADIAN news orgs?

But when this popped up I thought “ok so how the fuck is this different than China policing the internet for its citizens?”

What a joke Canada has become.

https://archive.ph/AcD1n