I've noticed something interesting when reading posts on Reddit about government support, and two posts in particular stood out to me in how one was defended and one was not.
One was discussing childcare support for households earning over £100k. Many of the replies defended the idea that these households should still receive support, the argument being that they work hard, pay substantial taxes and shouldn't be penalised for earning a good income.
The other post was about a single man earning £37k while living in social housing. The replies were noticeably different, with people questioning why someone on that salary should still benefit from affordable housing, basically saying he should pay more rent or move into private rental accommodation at a higher cost.
To me it was crazy how different the attitudes were to both posts. On the post about about the household bringing in £100k, government support was viewed as something hardworking taxpayers deserved. In the one about someone earning a fairly average salary living in social housing, government support wasn't looked at as something they deserved.
Now i'm not arguing either way that higher earners shouldn't receive childcare support, or that social housing should only be given to the poorest in society. What I'm questioning is why we seem so willing to defend government support for people on higher incomes, while being much more critical of support received by people on average wages.
Is this a genuine double standard in how we view government assistance? Or am I simply seeing two different Reddit audiences with completely different opinions? Also is it the way the media in the UK frame these issues influence on how we respond to them?